Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

Application by Shadbolt Group Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 3063

What happened

Shadbolt Group Pty Ltd applied to vary its Workshop Enterprise Agreement 2023 - 2027 under section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commissioner raised concerns with the Applicant under section 211 of the Act, sending correspondence on 21 January 2026 and 27 March 2026. Shadbolt Group Pty Ltd did not respond to these communications. The application was lodged on 24 October 2025.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed Shadbolt Group Pty Ltd’s application for variation of the enterprise agreement. The Commissioner found the Applicant had not prosecuted their case and failed to respond to correspondence. The decision was made under section 587(3)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009, for want of prosecution. The Commission noted its discretion to dismiss applications should be exercised with caution.

What it means for employers

Employers must actively engage with the Fair Work Commission when seeking variations to enterprise agreements. Failure to respond to correspondence and address concerns raised by the Commission can lead to the dismissal of the application.

What it means for employees

This decision highlights the importance of employers fulfilling their obligations when seeking to change enterprise agreements. Employees should be aware of their rights and ensure any proposed changes are properly considered and communicated.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3063.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases