Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

Application by the Applicant

Citation: [2026] FWC 2961

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission for a stop bullying order against GS Diamonds (Melbourne) Pty Ltd. She alleged bullying by employees and resigned on June 26, 2026, to avoid the working environment. The Commission initially offered to let her discontinue the application due to her resignation, but she requested the Commission determine the jurisdictional issue. The company was her employer at the time.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for a stop bullying order. The Deputy President found the Commission lacked jurisdiction because the Applicant is no longer employed by GS Diamonds. The Commission must be satisfied there is a risk of continued bullying, which is absent given her resignation. The application was dismissed under section 789FF of the Fair Work Act 2009.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that Fair Work Commission jurisdiction for stop bullying orders requires a risk of future bullying. Resignation can remove that risk, impacting the ability to enforce such orders.

What it means for employees

Employees seeking stop bullying orders should understand that resignation can impact the Fair Work Commission’s ability to hear the case, particularly if it removes the risk of future bullying.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsbullyingunfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2961.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases