the Applicant v Tam Jai Aust Co Outlets Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant worked as a part-time waitress for Tam Jai Aust Co Outlets Pty Ltd, a hospitality business, starting on January 13, 2025. On February 25, 2026, she had a confrontation with the Operations Manager, during which he told her to 'go home'. the Applicant interpreted this as a dismissal and took actions such as returning her uniform, blocking his contact, requesting termination payments, and sending an incident statement. The respondent claims the Applicant was instructed to leave temporarily due to a disagreement and that she remained employed.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act. The Deputy President found that the Applicant was not dismissed by Tam Jai Aust Co Outlets Pty Ltd, either directly or through conduct forcing her resignation. While the Operations Manager told her to 'go home', this did not constitute a termination. Subsequent actions by both parties, including communication about future shifts and a medical certificate, supported the finding that she remained employed.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear communication regarding employee status, especially when addressing disagreements or temporary absences. Instructions to leave premises should be carefully worded to avoid misinterpretation as termination. Maintaining contact with employees after such incidents can help clarify their employment status and prevent misunderstandings.
What it means for employees
Employees should seek clarification from employers if they are unsure about their employment status following an incident. Documenting all communication is important, but interpreting ambiguous instructions requires careful consideration of the overall context and subsequent actions by both parties.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.