the Applicant v Neela Motel Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 2422
What happened
the Applicant, a 67-year-old room attendant, worked at the Kaniva Midway Motel from March 2025 until February 2026. She was terminated via text message. She was paid by Neela Motel Pty Ltd, except for one payment by Neela Motel No 4 Pty Ltd. the Applicant estimated she was paid around $10.30 per room cleaned. She was not paid according to the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020. The motel is part of a larger network of businesses linked through directors Makhan Singh and Mandeesh Kaur Singh.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was harsh, unjust, and unreasonable. The Commission amended the application to name Neela Motel Pty Ltd as the respondent. the Respondent did not engage with the proceedings. The Commission determined the matter in the Respondent’s absence and ordered a remedy for the Applicant.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they comply with workplace laws and award conditions. They must engage with Fair Work Commission proceedings. Failure to do so can result in a finding of unfair dismissal and a remedy for the employee. The Commission considered the size of the business when determining the matter.
What it means for employees
If you believe you have been unfairly dismissed, you can apply to the Fair Work Commission. Keep records of your employment, including pay slips and communications. It is important to correctly identify your employer in any application.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2422.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections