Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by United Workers' Union (108V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2391

What happened

The United Workers' Union applied to extend the period for industrial action authorized by a protected action ballot (PR810156) in relation to matter B2026/549. The ballot result was declared on June 2, 2026. Section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act allows the Commissioner to extend this period by up to 30 days if certain conditions are met, and the period hasn't been extended before. Tatura Milk Industries Pty Ltd, the employer, did not object to the application.

What was decided

The Commissioner granted the United Workers’ Union’s application to extend the industrial action period by a further 30 days. The extension is effective from July 2, 2026. As Tatura Milk Industries Pty Ltd raised no objection, the Commission was satisfied that the requirements of the Act were met. This means eligible employees covered by the ballot can now engage in protected industrial action for an additional 30 days.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the provisions allowing extensions to periods of authorized industrial action under section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act. It's important to monitor ballots and understand their implications, as well as engage with unions if applications for extensions are made.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by a protected action ballot may now have an extended period in which they can participate in authorized industrial action. Check your union’s advice regarding the new timeframe and any planned actions.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsindustrial-actionprotected-actionmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2391.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases