Application by "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) (188V)
Citation: [2026] FWC 2279
What happened
The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) applied for a protected action ballot order (PABO) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, concerning employees of Bundaberg Brewed Drinks Pty Ltd (BBD). The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made a similar application. BBD objected, stating progress had been made in bargaining and the AMWU’s action was premature and not reflective of genuine engagement. Both unions are involved in the same enterprise agreement negotiations.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted the AMWU's application for a PABO. The Commission found that a valid application had been made and it was required to make the order. The ballot will be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), an approved ballot agent. Voting must close by 6 July 2026. A compulsory conciliation conference will be scheduled with another Fair Work Commissioner to facilitate negotiations.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure genuine and meaningful engagement occurs during enterprise bargaining processes. Simply making progress does not preclude union action if unresolved issues remain. Employers must also consider how their actions in previous negotiations might impact future proceedings, as noted regarding the CEPU’s conduct.
What it means for employees
Employees may see further industrial action through a protected ballot process as unions attempt to reach agreement with employers. The outcome of this PABO demonstrates that unions can pursue protected action even when some progress has been made in negotiations.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2279.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →