the Applicant v PaperCut Software Pty Ltd
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with PaperCut Software Pty Ltd. He was dismissed after allegedly failing to follow a direction from his employer. the Applicant argued his dismissal was unfair and that the direction was unlawful and unreasonable. The Fair Work Commission considered whether PaperCut Software had a valid reason for the dismissal.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found PaperCut Software had a valid reason for dismissing the Applicant. The Commission stated that the Applicant failed to follow a direction from his employer. It also found the direction was lawful and reasonable. Therefore, the Commission determined the dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. The Commission did not award any remedy to the Applicant. As stated in the decision, 'the applicant failed to follow a lawful and reasonable direction'.
What it means for employers
Employers can assert a valid reason for dismissal if an employee fails to follow a lawful and reasonable direction. Clear communication of expectations and directions is important to ensure employees understand their obligations.
What it means for employees
Employees are expected to follow lawful and reasonable directions from their employer. Failure to do so can be grounds for dismissal. Employees should seek clarification if they are unsure about a direction or believe it is unlawful.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.