Skip to main content
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 9 April 2026

FWO v Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd and the Respondent

Citation: FWO-LIT/2025-2026/drew-and-schofer-real-estate-and-graeme-drew/2026-04-09

At a glance

Respondent
Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd and Graeme Drew
Penalty
$14,850

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) took legal action against Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd and the Respondent. The proceedings involved non-compliance with a compliance notice. Details of the specific nature of the non-compliance are not provided in this document.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court found Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd and the Respondent in breach of workplace laws. They were penalised $14,850 for failing to comply with a compliance notice. The decision is documented as Fair Work Ombudsman v Drew and Schofer Real Estate Pty Ltd [2026] FedCFamC2G 550.

What it means for employers

Employers must adhere to compliance notices issued by the FWO. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties, demonstrating the importance of understanding and fulfilling legal obligations regarding workplace laws.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware that the Fair Work Ombudsman enforces workplace laws and takes action against employers who fail to comply with those laws. This highlights the protections available to workers.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionspenalty-ratesmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/about-us/compliance-and-enforcement/litigation/2025-2026-litigation-outcomes

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases