Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 2 November 2025

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2025-11-03-um-cn-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$27,000
Employees affected
1

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman took legal action against Phyrum Um, the operator of Intense Panel & Paint (trading as Slick FX Bodystyling) in Yennora, New South Wales. An investigation began after a request from the mother of a young worker with a disability who was employed as a part-time apprentice panel beater between May 2021 and May 2022. The business allegedly failed to pay minimum wages, overtime, penalty rates, and accrued annual leave entitlements. A Compliance Notice was issued in June 2024, which Mr. Um did not follow.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a penalty of $9,577.80 against Phyrum Um. He was also ordered to pay the worker $17,971.73 in outstanding entitlements, plus interest and superannuation. Judge Lisa Doust emphasized the importance of complying with Compliance Notices and meeting legal obligations. The Fair Work Ombudsman stressed the consequences of failing to act on Compliance Notices.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and back-payment orders. Employers should prioritize meeting their legal obligations, particularly regarding young workers and apprentices.

What it means for employees

Employees, especially young apprentices, should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they have concerns about their pay or entitlements. Free advice and assistance are available through the Fair Work Infoline and website.

underpaymentpenalty-ratespublic-holidaysapprenticesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationcompliance-notice

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/november-2025/20251103-um-cn-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases