Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-08-22-moussa-penalty-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Xteria Designs
- Penalty
- $6,664
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant, who operated Xteria Designs in Leppington, south-west Sydney, failed to back-pay entitlements to a 15-year-old worker employed as a casual labourer between November 2021 and January 2022. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after a request for assistance from the worker. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in August 2022, which the Respondent did not follow.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $5,328 penalty against the Respondent for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. He was also ordered to back-pay the worker $1,336, plus superannuation and interest. the Commissioner stated that failing to act on Compliance Notices can result in penalties and back-pay orders. The FWO prioritises compliance in the building and construction industry and protecting young workers.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and back-pay orders. Businesses, particularly those employing young workers, should ensure they understand and meet their obligations regarding wages and entitlements.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they are owed wages or entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Young workers are particularly encouraged to seek help if they have concerns about their pay.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/august-2024/20240822-moussa-penalty-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections