Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-05-03-corben-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Southside General & Bond Cleaning Services
- Penalty
- $5,582
- Employees affected
- 2
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Respondent, the former operator of Southside General & Bond Cleaning Services in Queensland. Two young casual cleaners, aged 19 and 21, requested assistance after working for the Respondent in January-February 2022. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in December 2022, alleging underpayment of casual minimum wages, overtime rates, weekend penalty rates, and public holiday penalty rates. The Respondent allegedly failed to comply with the notice and provided false and misleading payslips.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is taking legal action against the Respondent for failing to comply with a Compliance Notice and providing false payslips. She faces potential penalties of up to $8,250 for the Compliance Notice breach and $13,320 for the payslip contravention. The FWO seeks orders for full rectification of alleged underpayments, including superannuation and interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for May 24, 2024, in the Federal Circuit and Family Court in Brisbane. The total alleged underpayment is $5,582.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Providing accurate payslips is a legal requirement. Employers should prioritise ensuring young workers receive their correct entitlements and be aware of the FWO’s focus on protecting vulnerable workers.
What it means for employees
Employees, particularly young workers, should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they suspect they are being underpaid or have concerns about their pay or entitlements. Accurate payslips must be provided to employees.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/may-2024/20240503-corben-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →