Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 9 November 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-11-10-anastasio-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
SA Dents & Detailing
Penalty
$6,660
Employees affected
2
Awards cited
MA000117

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against the Respondent, the operator of ‘SA Dents & Detailing’ in Payneham, Adelaide. Two casual workers were employed for short periods in October-November 2020 and January 2021 to perform car detailing duties. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in February 2022 after believing the workers were not paid wages and were entitled to minimum wages plus a casual loading under the Vehicle Repair, Services and Retail Award 2020. The Respondent allegedly failed to comply with the notice.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking a penalty against the Respondent for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. A penalty of up to $6,660 is possible. The Ombudsman also seeks an order for the Respondent to rectify the alleged underpayment, including interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for January 2023 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements, plus interest. Employers should ensure they are paying employees correctly and seek advice if unsure.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have not been paid correctly should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Interpreter services are available.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/november-2022/20221110-anastasio-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases