Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 4 May 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-05-05-tipene-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
The brothers metal roofing
Penalty
$6,660
Employees affected
2
Awards cited
MA000128

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against the Respondent, who operates 'The brothers metal roofing' in Sydney. Two workers, a roof plumber and a casual labourer, were employed between March and August 2021. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in October 2021 after believing the workers were underpaid wages, allowances, and leave entitlements under the Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2020 and the National Employment Standards. The Respondent allegedly failed to comply with the notice.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking a penalty against the Respondent for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The penalty could be up to $6,660. The FWO also seeks orders for the Respondent to rectify the alleged underpayments, calculate and pay superannuation, and interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for May 27, 2022.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay entitlements, plus superannuation and interest. Employers should review their payroll practices to ensure compliance with relevant awards and legislation.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or denied entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. The Fair Work Infoline is available for support and interpreters are available.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationcompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/may-2022/20220505-tipene-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases