Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 3 May 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-05-04-rl-medispa-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Rachael Louise Medispa Pty Ltd
Penalty
$29,970
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000113

What happened

Rachael Louise Medispa Pty Ltd, a cosmetic injectables and skin clinic in Drummoyne, Sydney, and its sole director, Rachael Louise Birch, have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a failure to comply with a Compliance Notice regarding unpaid entitlements to a worker employed as an advanced cosmetic injector and head trainer between December 8 and 25, 2020. The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after a worker requested assistance. The clinic failed to backpay the worker as required by the Nurses Award 2010.

What was decided

The court imposed a $24,975 penalty on Rachael Louise Medispa Pty Ltd and a $4,995 penalty on Rachael Louise Birch. The court also ordered the clinic to comply with the Compliance Notice and backpay the worker approximately $3,048.50. Judge Nicholas Manousaridis found the failure to comply was deliberate. The penalties are intended to deter other employers from disregarding Compliance Notices.

What it means for employers

Employers must act on Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant court-imposed penalties and the obligation to backpay workers. This case highlights the consequences of wilfully disregarding legal obligations regarding worker entitlements.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have not received all their lawful entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. The Fair Work Infoline is available for support and information.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationcompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/may-2022/20220504-rl-medispa-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases