Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 20 April 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-04-21-matthew-peers-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Matt's Gutta & Roofing Restos
Penalty
$6,660
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000073

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against the Respondent, who operated a roofing business called ‘Matt’s Gutta & Roofing Restos’ in Loganlea, Brisbane. The action followed a request for assistance from a former part-time administration assistant who worked between July 2020 and June 2021. An inspector issued a Compliance Notice in August 2021, alleging unpaid payment-in-lieu-of-notice and accrued annual leave entitlements. the Respondent allegedly failed to comply with the notice.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges the Respondent failed to comply with a Compliance Notice requiring him to pay outstanding entitlements to a former employee. The Ombudsman is seeking a court order for the Respondent to rectify any underpayments, including superannuation and interest. A directions hearing is scheduled. The Fair Work Ombudsman aims to enforce workplace laws and penalise non-compliance.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in penalties and court orders to rectify underpayments. Employers should ensure they understand their obligations regarding payment-in-lieu-of-notice and annual leave entitlements.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have not received proper pay or entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for assistance. Free advice and support are available through the Fair Work Infoline and website.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationcompliance

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/april-2022/20220421-matthew-peers-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases