Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2022-04-20-donence-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Oscar Donence
- Penalty
- $4,100
- Employees affected
- 1
- Awards cited
- MA000073
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against the Respondent, the operator of a kitchen installation business in Melbourne. A worker employed as a general hand and trades assistant between February and March 2021, contacted the Fair Work Ombudsman seeking assistance. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in July 2021, believing the worker was underpaid entitlements under relevant awards. The Respondent allegedly failed to comply with this notice.
What was decided
The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a penalty of $4,100 against the Respondent for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking a court order for the Respondent to calculate and rectify any underpayment, including superannuation and interest. A directions hearing was scheduled for May 2022.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties. Employers should ensure they understand their obligations regarding employee entitlements and seek assistance if unsure.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are experiencing issues with their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. The Fair Work Ombudsman can investigate and take action against employers who fail to meet their obligations.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/april-2022/20220420-donence-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections