Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 31 January 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-02-01-williams-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Modern Day Communications
Penalty
$6,600
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000129

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has taken legal action against the Respondent, who operates Modern Day Communications in Melbourne. A graphic designer working casually for the business from October 2020 to February 2021, and who was a visa holder from South Korea, reportedly did not receive wages. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in April 2021, which the Respondent allegedly failed to comply with. The business is a communications agency.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is taking the Respondent to court for allegedly failing to comply with a Compliance Notice. The notice required her to calculate and back-pay the worker’s outstanding entitlements, including casual minimum wages under relevant awards. The Respondent faces a maximum penalty of $6,600. The Fair Work Ombudsman is also seeking a court order for her to rectify the underpayment, including superannuation and interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for February 2022.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and court orders to rectify underpayments. Employers should ensure they are paying employees correctly and keeping accurate records.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are experiencing issues with their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Visa holders are entitled to the same workplace rights as Australian citizens.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentcasual-conversiongeneral-protectionspenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/february-2022/20220201-williams-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases