the Applicant v Ezi-Flo Roofing & Plumbing Services Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant appealed a decision made on May 8, 2026, by the Commissioner. The original decision denied an extension of time for the Applicant to file a s 365 application concerning his dismissal. The Applicant initially filed an application within the timeframe but withdrew it after receiving advice from his representative to attempt resolution and pursue a s 372 application. the Respondent, Ezi-Flo Roofing & Plumbing Services Pty Ltd, did not cooperate with this process.
What was decided
the Full Bench refused permission for the Applicant to appeal the Commissioner’s decision. the bench found that the Applicant did not present an arguable case of appealable error. They noted he raised a new argument about representative error during the hearing, which wasn't made initially and lacked clarity. the bench also questioned his use of a s 372 application and rejected newly submitted evidence. Permission to appeal was denied as it was deemed not in the public interest.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees follow proper procedures when lodging claims, and that any delays are properly explained and documented. Failure to cooperate with attempts at resolution could be perceived negatively if a claim proceeds.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking extensions of time for applications must provide full and accurate information upfront. Raising new arguments during an appeal hearing without prior disclosure can weaken the case. Understanding the different types of Fair Work claims is important, as choosing the wrong one may impact your ability to pursue a claim.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.