the Applicant v Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant appealed a decision made by the Commissioner, who dismissed his unfair deactivation application. The Applicant had not attended case management conferences or filed required documents according to the commissioner's directions. He claimed he was in Ethiopia dealing with a family emergency and couldn’t manage correspondence. Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd was the respondent.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench refused the Applicant permission to appeal the Commissioner’s decision. The bench found the Applicant did not demonstrate an arguable case of error in the original decision. He failed to explain why he didn't notify the commission about his absence or arrange for message checking. The bench also declined to accept new medical information and travel documents as evidence.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees understand procedural requirements in Fair Work matters. Consistent non-compliance with directions can lead to applications being dismissed, even if there are extenuating circumstances. Clear communication protocols regarding absences and correspondence management are important.
What it means for employees
Employees must adhere to the Commission’s directions and deadlines. Failure to do so may result in an application being dismissed. It is crucial to communicate any unavoidable absences or difficulties promptly, and make arrangements for managing communications during those periods.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.