the Applicant v Eastern Melbourne Healthcare Network Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCFB 158
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant appealed a Fair Work Commission decision that her dismissal from Eastern Melbourne Healthcare Network Ltd (EMHN) was not unfair. The original Deputy President found the Applicant engaged in dishonest conduct related to a personal travel booking, misused her position, and failed to act with transparency. She argued the findings of fact were not open on the evidence and she wasn’t given adequate opportunity to respond. The Commission initially heard the matter for permission to appeal only.
What was decided
The Fair Work Full Bench refused the Applicant’s application for permission to appeal the Deputy President’s decision. They found the Deputy President’s findings of fact regarding her conduct were open on the evidence and that she was given an opportunity to respond. The bench determined there was no arguable case of appealable error, and it wasn't in the public interest to grant permission to appeal.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure disciplinary processes are thorough and well-documented, with clear communication of allegations and opportunities for employees to respond. Maintaining transparency and integrity within workplace systems is crucial to prevent misuse and potential dismissal.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to a fair process during investigations and disciplinary actions. If you believe you haven't been afforded procedural fairness, seek legal advice about your options.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwcfb158.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →