Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 28 May 2026

Variation on the Commission’s own initiative – gender undervaluation – priority awards review,Variation on the Commission’s own initiative – gender undervaluation – priority awards review

Citation: [2026] FWCFB 126

At a glance

Awards cited
MA000120

What happened

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) is undertaking a review of gender undervaluation in certain modern awards. This decision, [2026] FWCFB 126, relates to a variation initiated by the Commission itself. The review covers the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020. The Commission has issued Phase 2 determinations as part of this review. Justice Hatcher was involved in the decision.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission is varying certain modern awards as part of its gender undervaluation review. The Commission has issued Phase 2 determinations for the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020. The specific details of the variations and the reasoning behind them are contained within the full decision document.

What it means for employers

Employers covered by the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020 should review the Phase 2 determinations issued by the Fair Work Commission. They need to understand how these variations affect their obligations and employee entitlements. This highlights the Commission’s focus on addressing gender undervaluation in awards.

What it means for employees

Employees working under the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Pharmacy Industry Award 2020 should be aware of the changes made by the Fair Work Commission. These variations may impact their pay and conditions. Employees should review the full decision to understand the specific changes that apply to them.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate AI goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsmodern-award-variationpenalty-ratespublic-holidays

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/variation-on-the-commissions-own-initiative-gender-undervaluation-24

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases