Application by Gordon Brothers Industries Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 2168
What happened
Gordon Brothers Industries Pty Ltd sought approval for its Electrical Trades Enterprise Agreement 2025. The company identified typographical errors in clauses 52.1 (formatting) and 9 (subclause numbering). These errors were attributed to human error during formatting. The Fair Work Commission considered the application under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Gordon Brothers Industries Pty Ltd Electrical Trades Enterprise Agreement 2025, with amendments to correct identified typographical errors. Clause 52.1 was reworded for clarity regarding jury service reimbursement. Subclause 9.6 was renumbered as 9.7. The changes are effective from August 19, 2026. Certain undertakings provided by the employer were also adopted as terms of the agreement. A model flexibility term was incorporated under section 202(4).
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully proofread enterprise agreements to avoid typographical errors and numbering inconsistencies. Section 218A allows for correction of obvious errors, but prevention is preferable. Ensure formatting processes are robust to minimise human error.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by the agreement benefit from clarified wording in clause 52.1 regarding jury service reimbursement. The renumbering of subclause 9.6 ensures consistency in wage calculations and related benefits.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2168.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →