Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

Application by Hexham Bowling Club Co-Operative Limited

Citation: [2026] FWCA 2016

What happened

Hexham Bowling Club Co-Operative Limited applied to terminate its enterprise agreement, the Hexham Bowling Club Enterprise Agreement. The agreement was initially approved on March 15, 2011, and had a nominal expiry date of March 21, 2014. The Applicant sought termination under section 225 of the Fair Work Act.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found that grounds for terminating the agreement existed under section 226(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied it was appropriate to terminate the agreement and fixed August 3, 2026 as the termination date. As Deputy President Slevin stated, 'I am satisfied that s 226(1)(a) applies and that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to terminate the Agreement.'

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the process for terminating enterprise agreements, particularly regarding expiry dates and the requirements outlined in section 226 of the Fair Work Act. Careful consideration must be given to the grounds for termination.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the Hexham Bowling Club Enterprise Agreement will see their agreement terminate on August 3, 2026. They should understand how this affects their terms and conditions of employment following that date.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca2016.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases