Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Gippsland Grammar

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1997

What happened

Gippsland Grammar sought approval for the Gippsland Grammar Enterprise Agreement 2026. The agreement included a clause (2B.4) regarding pay rates for ‘GAP’ assistants, which initially appeared to set their wage at Level 1.2A regardless of age. This raised concerns about whether employees over 20 would be paid appropriately. Gippsland Grammar provided written undertakings to address this issue.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Gippsland Grammar Enterprise Agreement 2026. The Deputy President was satisfied that the agreement met the requirements of sections 186, 187 and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Concerns about the GAP Assistant pay rate were resolved with written undertakings from Gippsland Grammar, which became terms of the agreement. The Independent Education Union of Australia (IEU) is covered by the agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers should carefully review enterprise agreements to ensure clarity regarding pay rates for all employee groups. Ambiguous clauses can lead to concerns about compliance with age-based wage entitlements. Providing written undertakings can resolve issues and secure approval, but these become legally binding terms.

What it means for employees

Employees should review enterprise agreements to understand their pay entitlements. If there are any ambiguities or concerns about whether the agreement is being applied correctly, seek advice from a union or Fair Work Ombudsman.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1997.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases