Application by Timber, Furnishing and Textiles Union (302V)
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1913
What happened
The Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a single-enterprise agreement with Mathews Timber Pty Ltd. The agreement is called the Mathews Timber Pty Ltd and TFTU Union Collective Bargaining Agreement 2026. The union acts as a bargaining representative for the employees. The Respondent provided an undertaking that more beneficial entitlements under the National Employment Standards (NES) will prevail if there's a conflict.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Mathews Timber Pty Ltd and TFTU Union Collective Bargaining Agreement 2026. The agreement will take effect seven days after approval. The Commissioner noted some provisions might be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards, but the Respondent’s undertaking addresses this. The union is covered by the agreement as per section 201(2) of the Fair Work Act.
What it means for employers
Employers entering into enterprise agreements must ensure they don't create inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards. Providing an undertaking to prioritise NES entitlements can help address potential conflicts and secure approval for the agreement.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by this agreement will benefit from the terms negotiated between their union and Mathews Timber Pty Ltd. If any term in the agreement is less favourable than the National Employment Standards, the NES provisions will apply instead.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1913.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections