Application by Saint Stephen's College Limited Trading AS Saint Stephen's College
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1895
What happened
Saint Stephen's College Limited, trading as Saint Stephen’s College, applied for approval of the Saint Stephen’s College Enterprise Agreement 2026 under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. A minor discrepancy existed between the agreement title in the Notice of Employee Representational Rights and the actual agreement. The Independent Education Union of Australia (IEUA) and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) indicated they wanted the agreement to cover them.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Saint Stephen’s College Enterprise Agreement 2026. the Commissioner noted a minor technical error in the agreement title but deemed it insignificant. The commission was satisfied that employee representational rights were covered and that the National Employment Standards (NES) would prevail where there was inconsistency with the agreement. The agreement will operate from July 28, 2026, and expire on December 31, 2029.
What it means for employers
Employers seeking to implement enterprise agreements should ensure consistency between documents like Notices of Employee Representational Rights and the final agreement. Written undertakings can be used to address concerns and ensure employee benefits are maintained.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by this agreement will benefit from the terms outlined in the Saint Stephen’s College Enterprise Agreement 2026, with the National Employment Standards providing a safety net where entitlements conflict.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1895.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections