Application by Tricorbraun Anz Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1786
What happened
Tricorbraun ANZ Pty Ltd, Glomar and Galli sought approval for the TricorBraun ANZ Pty Ltd Glomar and Galli Enterprise Agreement 2026, alongside the United Workers Union (UWU). The application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Several issues were raised with Tricorbraun regarding the agreement, which they addressed through written undertakings. The UWU confirmed it wanted the agreement to cover them.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the TricorBraun ANZ Pty Ltd Glomar and Galli Enterprise Agreement 2026 and United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2026. the Commissioner was satisfied that the undertakings provided by Tricorbraun would not cause financial detriment to employees or substantially change the agreement. The National Employment Standards take precedence over certain clauses in the agreement, including a clause regarding redundancy pay. The agreement will operate for seven days after approval.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure any enterprise agreements address potential inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards and provide appropriate undertakings to resolve concerns raised during the approval process. Provisions relating to redundancy entitlements must be carefully considered in light of section 120 of the Fair Work Act.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by this agreement benefit from the terms outlined within it, noting that the National Employment Standards will apply where the agreement is less favourable. The UWU is covered under the agreement.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1786.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections