Application by Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd Trading AS Qube Logistics
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1722
At a glance
- Awards cited
- MA000038
What happened
Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd and its New South Wales train crew had a workplace agreement, the Qube Logistics (Rail) Train Crew NSW Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the 2019 Agreement), which replaced an earlier agreement in 2019. The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU) was covered by both agreements. In July 2023, the Applicant applied to vary the 2019 Agreement due to ambiguity regarding whether pay rates were ‘loaded’ or base rates with modern award penalties applying. This dispute arose because terms of the Rail Industry Award 2020 are incorporated into the agreement.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that the 2019 Agreement contained ambiguity concerning how agreement rates interact with penalty and allowance payments under the Rail Industry Award 2020. The Commissioner decided to vary the agreement retrospectively, from its commencement date. This decision followed previous decisions by the Full Court of the Federal Court which had quashed earlier rulings on this matter and remitted it back to the Fair Work Commission for reconsideration. The Commissioner considered the history of prior agreements and the Respondent’s business operations when reaching their conclusion.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure enterprise agreements are clear and unambiguous regarding how they interact with modern awards, particularly concerning penalty rates and allowances. Reviewing existing agreements to address potential ambiguities is crucial. Understanding the historical context and previous agreements can be important in interpreting current obligations.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by enterprise agreements should understand their entitlements related to penalty rates and allowances. If there's uncertainty about how an agreement interacts with modern awards, employees may have grounds to seek clarification or legal advice. This case highlights the importance of clear language in workplace agreements.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1722.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →