Application by Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd Trading AS Qube Logistics
At a glance
- MA000038
What happened
Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd and its New South Wales train crew had a workplace agreement, the Qube Logistics (Rail) Train Crew NSW Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the 2019 Agreement), which replaced an earlier agreement in 2019. The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU) was covered by both agreements. In July 2023, the Applicant applied to vary the 2019 Agreement due to ambiguity regarding whether pay rates were ‘loaded’ or base rates with modern award penalties applying. This dispute arose because terms of the Rail Industry Award 2020 are incorporated into the agreement.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that the 2019 Agreement contained ambiguity concerning how agreement rates interact with penalty and allowance payments under the Rail Industry Award 2020. The Commissioner decided to vary the agreement retrospectively, from its commencement date. This decision followed previous decisions by the Full Court of the Federal Court which had quashed earlier rulings on this matter and remitted it back to the Fair Work Commission for reconsideration. The Commissioner considered the history of prior agreements and the Respondent’s business operations when reaching their conclusion.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure enterprise agreements are clear and unambiguous regarding how they interact with modern awards, particularly concerning penalty rates and allowances. Reviewing existing agreements to address potential ambiguities is crucial. Understanding the historical context and previous agreements can be important in interpreting current obligations.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by enterprise agreements should understand their entitlements related to penalty rates and allowances. If there's uncertainty about how an agreement interacts with modern awards, employees may have grounds to seek clarification or legal advice. This case highlights the importance of clear language in workplace agreements.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.