Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1637

What happened

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) applied for approval of an enterprise agreement between TTL Air Pty Ltd and the CEPU - Plumbing Division NSW Branch Mechanical (Sheetmetal) Enterprise Agreement 2026-2028. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement covering employees in the electrical contracting industry.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement. While the notice of employee representational rights was not in the prescribed form, it was considered a minor technical error and did not disadvantage employees. The Commissioner found that all requirements under sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act were met. The agreement also covers the CEPU as required by section 201(2).

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure notices to employees regarding representational rights are in the prescribed form to avoid potential delays or complications in enterprise agreement approval, although minor errors may be overlooked if they do not disadvantage employees.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the new enterprise agreement will have their terms and conditions of employment governed by this agreement. The CEPU represents these employees in bargaining for improved working conditions.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1637.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases