Application by Iplex Pipelines Australia Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWCA 1620
What happened
Iplex Pipelines Australia Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2025 – Bohle. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement and covers the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU). Concerns were raised regarding shift work patterns, but the company argued employees wouldn't typically work less than five successive shifts. Written undertakings were provided by the Applicant.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Iplex Pipelines Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 – Bohle, subject to certain undertakings. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met all relevant requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 and would not detrimentally affect employees. Some clauses were noted as potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES), but the more beneficial NES entitlements will prevail. The agreement covers the TWU and will operate from June 30, 2026, expiring on April 19, 2029.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure enterprise agreements address potential inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards (NES) and include provisions for their application. They also need to consider how shift work patterns might impact employees when drafting agreements. Providing written undertakings can help alleviate concerns raised during the approval process.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by this agreement should be aware of clauses that may conflict with the National Employment Standards (NES). In cases of inconsistency, the more beneficial NES entitlements will apply. The Transport Workers’ Union is covered under this agreement.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1620.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →