Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 26 May 2026

Application by Cranbourne Pakenham Racing Club Inc

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1388

What happened

Cranbourne Pakenham Racing Club Inc applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a single-enterprise agreement called the Southside Racing Pakenham Racecourse Agreement 2026–2028. The application was assigned case number AG2026/1062 and came before the Commissioner. The club operates in the racing industry and holds ABN 71575147211. The agreement was described as a bridging-period agreement.

What was decided

The Commissioner approved the Southside Racing Pakenham Racecourse Agreement 2026–2028. The agreement was given the identifier AE532992 and is set to expire on 30 June 2028. The decision also references a Fair Work Commission Full Bench decision concerning the variation of modern awards to include a delegates' rights term, suggesting that term was considered as part of the approval process.

What it means for employers

Employers in the racing industry seeking enterprise agreement approval should be aware that agreements must now include a delegates' rights term, consistent with recent Full Bench guidance. Bridging-period agreements remain a recognised option for organisations needing interim coverage while negotiating longer-term arrangements.

What it means for employees

Employees covered by the Southside Racing Pakenham Racecourse Agreement 2026–2028 will have their terms and conditions governed by this agreement until at least 30 June 2028. The inclusion of a delegates' rights term means workplace delegates have formally recognised rights under the agreement.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1388.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases