Samrat Kc v Eat House King Square Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 394
What happened
Samrat Kc brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Eat House King Square Pty Ltd. The details of the dismissal and the reasons for it are not provided in the available text. Deputy President Binet heard the case.
What was decided
The text does not detail the decision or reasoning. It indicates the case was heard by Deputy President Binet and is identified as application U2025/16174.
What it means for employers
The text does not provide information to derive employer implications.
What it means for employees
The text does not provide information to derive employee implications.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/samrat-kc-v-eat-house-king-square-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-394Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →