the Applicant v Total Drain Group Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 3319
What happened
the Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy against Total Drain Group Pty Ltd. Total Drain Group raised a jurisdictional objection, arguing the dismissal was a genuine redundancy. The Commission issued directions for filing documents and listed hearings. the Applicant failed to attend a Mention on July 29, 2026, and a Non-Compliance Hearing on August 28, 2026, despite receiving notifications via email and voicemail. Total Drain Group applied to dismiss the application under s.399A of the Fair Work Act.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commission found the Applicant unreasonably failed to comply with directions and attend hearings. The Commission exercised its discretion under s.399A of the Fair Work Act to dismiss the application, noting the Applicant had multiple opportunities to engage with the process but did not respond to communications or requests for information.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they follow correct legal naming procedures. They can also apply to have an application dismissed if an employee fails to comply with Commission directions. Consistent communication and adherence to procedural fairness are important.
What it means for employees
Employees must comply with directions from the Fair Work Commission and attend scheduled hearings. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of their application, even if they have a valid claim. Respond to communications from the Commission promptly.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3319.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections