Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by CFMEU (105N)

Citation: [2026] FWC 3276

What happened

The CFMEU applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application related to employees of Port of Portland Pty Limited. The CFMEU and Port of Portland were in bargaining negotiations for a proposed enterprise agreement. The employer did not object to the application, and a minor inconsistency was amended. The ballot will be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS).

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the CFMEU’s application for a protected action ballot order. The Commission was satisfied that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were met. The ballot will close on 11 September 2026, a period of 14 calendar days. A compulsory conciliation conference will be held, and directions may be issued to facilitate negotiations. A separate order was issued (PR813750).

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the process for enterprise bargaining and the potential for employees to seek protected action ballot orders. It's important to engage in genuine bargaining and address any inconsistencies in applications promptly.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights to engage in protected industrial action through a ballot process. The union will conduct a ballot, and a conciliation conference will be held to facilitate negotiations.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsprotected-action

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3276.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases