Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Sea1 Offshore Australia Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 3250

What happened

Sea1 Offshore Australia Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission to approve its Engineer Officers Enterprise Agreement 2025. Sea1, previously using labour hire, wants to directly employ its own crew. The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (AIMPE) opposes the approval, arguing the Australian Workers Union (AWU) is not eligible to represent the employees covered by the agreement. The AWU contends it can represent the marine engineers.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the Sea1 Offshore Australia Pty Ltd Engineer Officers Enterprise Agreement 2025. The Commission dismissed the AIMPE’s objection. It found the AWU’s rules provide coverage for the employees covered by the agreement. The decision follows a similar approval of a related agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers entering into greenfields agreements should ensure all relevant unions are eligible to represent employees. Consult with unions early in the process to avoid disputes about union coverage. Understand the scope of union rules and how they apply to the workforce.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of which unions represent them and their rights under enterprise agreements. If there are disagreements about union representation, the Fair Work Commission can resolve these disputes.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementunion-representationgreenfields-agreementindustrial-relationsunion-ruleshydrocarbons-industry

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3250.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases