the Applicant v Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant, an employee of Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd working at Port Botany Terminal as an Alternative Operations Roster, was not selected for a Crane Operator position in early 2025. He lodged a personal grievance under the 2022 Enterprise Agreement, which Patrick rejected. the Applicant then sought to have the dispute resolved by the Fair Work Commission under the 2026 Enterprise Agreement, which replaced the 2022 agreement. Patrick argued the Commission lacked jurisdiction.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) dismissed Patrick Stevedores’ argument that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the Applicant's dispute. The FWC found the dispute concerned a matter pertaining to their employment relationship, specifically his non-selection for a Crane Operator position and Patrick's handling of his grievance. While the initial issue arose under the 2022 Enterprise Agreement, the dispute remained alive. Therefore, the Commission has jurisdiction to deal with it.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that disputes arising from past actions can still trigger Fair Work Commission jurisdiction even if the relevant enterprise agreement has changed. The ongoing nature of a disagreement, and an employee's continued dissatisfaction, can keep a dispute 'alive' for jurisdictional purposes. It is important to consider whether a grievance has truly been resolved in the eyes of the employee.
What it means for employees
Employees should know that they may be able to pursue disputes through the Fair Work Commission even if the initial issue arose under an older enterprise agreement, as long as the dispute remains unresolved and pertains to their employment relationship. Understand your rights and options for resolving workplace disagreements.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.