the Applicant v Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 3059
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant, an employee of Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd working at Port Botany Terminal as an Alternative Operations Roster, was not selected for a Crane Operator position in early 2025. He lodged a personal grievance under the 2022 Enterprise Agreement, which Patrick rejected. the Applicant then sought to have the dispute resolved by the Fair Work Commission under the 2026 Enterprise Agreement, which replaced the 2022 agreement. Patrick argued the Commission lacked jurisdiction.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) dismissed Patrick Stevedores’ argument that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the Applicant's dispute. The FWC found the dispute concerned a matter pertaining to their employment relationship, specifically his non-selection for a Crane Operator position and Patrick's handling of his grievance. While the initial issue arose under the 2022 Enterprise Agreement, the dispute remained alive. Therefore, the Commission has jurisdiction to deal with it.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that disputes arising from past actions can still trigger Fair Work Commission jurisdiction even if the relevant enterprise agreement has changed. The ongoing nature of a disagreement, and an employee's continued dissatisfaction, can keep a dispute 'alive' for jurisdictional purposes. It is important to consider whether a grievance has truly been resolved in the eyes of the employee.
What it means for employees
Employees should know that they may be able to pursue disputes through the Fair Work Commission even if the initial issue arose under an older enterprise agreement, as long as the dispute remains unresolved and pertains to their employment relationship. Understand your rights and options for resolving workplace disagreements.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3059.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →