Application by the Applicant
Citation: [2026] FWC 3033
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
The Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission on July 7, 2026, seeking an order to stop bullying at work. The application named DHL Express (Australia) Pty Ltd and individuals he interacted with while employed there. Shortly after, on July 14, 2026, DHL terminated the Applicant's employment. He is no longer working for or interacting with DHL.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commissioner found that, because the Applicant is no longer employed by DHL and does not interact with the named individuals in a work context, the application has no reasonable prospects of success. The Commission cannot make orders to stop bullying when the applicant is no longer affected.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that Fair Work Commission applications for anti-bullying orders require an ongoing workplace relationship between the applicant and respondent. Termination of employment can render such applications moot.
What it means for employees
Employees experiencing bullying at work should understand that seeking a Fair Work Commission order to stop bullying requires them to still be employed by, or interacting with, the alleged bullies in a work context.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3033.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections