Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by CFMEU - The Maritime Union of Australia Division (105N-MUA)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2935

What happened

The CFMEU, through its Maritime Union of Australia Division (MUA), applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This application relates to employees of Transdev Sydney Ferries Pty Ltd. The MUA and Transdev had been bargaining over an agreement. Transdev did not object to the amended application. Paul Garrett, Deputy Secretary of the CFMEU, provided a declaration outlining the bargaining steps taken.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted leave to amend the application and determined the matter on the papers. The Commission found that there was a notification time relating to the proposed agreement and that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were met. Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) will conduct the ballot, which must close by August 26, 2026. A separate order has been issued for compulsory conciliation.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they engage in genuine bargaining with unions and be prepared to provide clarification when requested by the Commission. Failure to object to an application may not prevent a ballot from proceeding.

What it means for employees

Employees may have the opportunity to vote on a protected action ballot, potentially leading to industrial action if negotiations remain unresolved. The ballot will be conducted by CiVS and must close by August 26, 2026.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2935.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases