Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Milburn Lake Pty. Ltd.

Citation: [2026] FWC 2893

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on December 12, 2025. The application was incomplete and the required fee was not paid, nor was a fee waiver requested. Commission staff attempted to contact him via email, SMS, and telephone multiple times between December 2025 and July 2026, requesting payment and a completed form. Chambers also sent further advice regarding the status of his application. the Applicant did not respond to these attempts.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant's unfair dismissal application (U2025/19680). The Commission found that the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 because it remained incomplete and unpaid, despite multiple attempts to contact him. As stated by the Deputy President, 'the Applicant has been given ample opportunity to rectify the deficiencies in the application and he has not responded'.

What it means for employers

This case highlights the importance of employees completing applications correctly and paying fees or applying for waivers. Employers should be aware that incomplete or unpaid applications can lead to dismissal.

What it means for employees

Employees must ensure their Fair Work applications are complete, include payment or a fee waiver request, and respond to communications from the Commission. Failure to do so may result in the application being dismissed.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2893.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases