the Applicant v McDonald's Australia Holdings Limited
What happened
the Applicant, an employee of McDonald's Australia Holdings Limited, applied for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Applicant alleged certain conduct by the Respondent. The core issue was whether his termination was fair. the Applicant represented himself, while a colleague appeared for McDonald’s.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. the Commissioner found a valid reason existed for the termination, relating to inconsistencies with company policies and his employment contract. While she noted these issues weren't initially communicated to the Applicant, this didn't make the dismissal unfair given the valid reason. The Commission considered factors like company size and warnings irrelevant.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear communication of performance or policy concerns to employees before termination. Although not required in this case, providing an opportunity for response can strengthen a fair process defence. Maintaining consistent application of policies is also important.
What it means for employees
Employees facing dismissal should understand their rights and seek advice if they believe the process was unfair. Even if communication about issues isn't perfect, it doesn’t automatically mean a dismissal is unfair.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.