Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Inghams Enterprises Pty. Limited

Citation: [2026] FWC 2727

What happened

the Applicant lodged an application with the Fair Work Commission on June 29, 2026, alleging contraventions involving dismissal. The application was not accompanied by the required fee or a fee waiver. The Commission repeatedly contacted the Applicant via SMS and email, requesting payment or a completed fee waiver form, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal. Despite these reminders, the Applicant did not respond.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Deputy President found the Applicant had been given sufficient opportunity to address the outstanding fee and warnings were disregarded. As per section 587(1)(a) of the Act, the application was deemed dismissible due to non-compliance with procedural requirements regarding fees.

What it means for employers

This case highlights the importance of adhering to Fair Work Commission procedures when lodging applications. Employers should be aware that failure to pay required fees or provide a fee waiver can lead to an application being dismissed, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.

What it means for employees

Employees must ensure they comply with all procedural requirements when making an application to the Fair Work Commission, including paying the prescribed fee or obtaining a fee waiver. Failure to do so may result in the application being dismissed.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsunfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2727.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases