Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (215V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2719

What happened

The Applicant applied for a protected action ballot order concerning employees of Water Corporation. The Applicant and the Respondent were in bargaining negotiations. The Respondent initially raised concerns about the notice period. Following discussions, they reached an agreement on an extended notice period. A Union Official, her colleague, confirmed steps taken during bargaining.

What was decided

The Commission granted a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The ballot will be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent. Voting must close by July 31, 2026. An extended written notice period of five working days was specified due to exceptional circumstances. A separate order was issued as PR812260 and a compulsory conference under section 448A will be conducted.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they engage in genuine bargaining with unions. They must also consider the requirements for providing adequate notice periods when protected action ballots are proposed, especially if exceptional circumstances exist that warrant an extended period.

What it means for employees

Employees may have access to protected action ballot orders to facilitate industrial negotiations. It's important to understand the process and timelines involved in such ballots, including the required notice periods.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreementprotected-action

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2719.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases