the Applicant v Century Products Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 2696
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on June 1, 2026. She stated she worked for Century Products Pty Ltd from May 26, 2026, and was dismissed on June 1, 2026. The Commission found her employment period was less than six months, making her ineligible to apply for unfair dismissal. Despite multiple attempts by the Commission to contact the Applicant regarding fees and eligibility requirements, she did not respond.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant's unfair dismissal application (U2026/9844). The decision was based on her short period of employment, which meant she didn't meet the minimum eligibility requirements for an unfair dismissal claim. The Commission also noted that she failed to pay the required fee or request a waiver. Section 587 of the Fair Work Act allowed the Commission to dismiss the application due to its lack of reasonable prospects of success.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that employees must meet minimum employment periods before lodging an unfair dismissal claim. This case highlights the importance of maintaining records of employee start dates and ensuring compliance with eligibility criteria for Fair Work claims.
What it means for employees
Employees need to ensure they have met the minimum six-month employment period before applying for an unfair dismissal claim. It is also crucial to pay application fees or request a fee waiver, and respond to communications from the Fair Work Commission regarding your application’s status.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2696.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →