Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (139V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2621

What happened

The Applicant applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This relates to employees of Pacific National Services Pty Ltd (Pacific National). The union and the Respondent agreed on an extended minimum notice period of five working days for any industrial action. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting) will conduct the ballot.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted the application for a protected action ballot order. It approved an extended notice period of five working days, which both parties agreed to. The ballot will be conducted by Vero Voting and voting must close by July 23, 2026. A compulsory conciliation conference will be held to facilitate negotiations regarding the proposed enterprise agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of union requests for protected action ballots. They need to engage constructively in bargaining processes and consider potential agreements on notice periods for industrial action. Failure to do so could lead to formal applications and compulsory conciliation.

What it means for employees

Employees may have the opportunity to vote in a protected action ballot if their union is seeking approval for industrial action. The extended notice period means employees will have more time to prepare for potential disruptions caused by any resulting action.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2621.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases