Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

Application by United Workers' Union (108V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2607

What happened

The Applicant applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application relates to employees of Bridgestone Australia Limited. The Applicant stated they have been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Bridgestone through bargaining. The Respondent did not object to the application.

What was decided

The Commissioner granted the Applicant’s request for a protected action ballot order. The ballot will be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, which is an approved ballot agent. Voting must close by 23 July 2026. A separate order was issued (PR811942). Another member of the Commission will conduct compulsory conciliation to facilitate negotiations.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they engage in genuine bargaining with unions when negotiating enterprise agreements. Failure to do so could lead to union applications for protected action ballots, potentially disrupting operations and impacting employee relations.

What it means for employees

Employees may have the opportunity to vote on a proposed enterprise agreement through a protected action ballot. This allows them to express their views on the terms of the agreement and potentially influence negotiations with their employer.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2607.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases