Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Scentre Group Limited

Citation: [2026] FWC 2602

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on November 27, 2025. He stated he began working for Scentre Group Limited on July 13, 2025 and was dismissed on November 17, 2025. The Commission found his employment period was less than six months, making him ineligible to apply for unfair dismissal. His application form was also incomplete, and the required fee wasn't paid or waived. Despite multiple attempts by the Commission to contact the Applicant regarding these issues, he did not respond.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application (U2025/18657). The Commission found the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 and had no reasonable prospects of success. This decision followed multiple attempts to contact the Applicant about his eligibility and incomplete paperwork, all without response. Section 587 of the Act allows for dismissal when there's no reasonable prospect of a successful outcome.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure employees are aware of the six-month minimum employment period required before an unfair dismissal claim can be made. Maintaining clear records of start dates and termination dates is crucial. Promptly addressing incomplete or deficient application forms from departing employees can help streamline processes and avoid unnecessary proceedings.

What it means for employees

Employees must meet the minimum employment period (six months for most employers) to lodge an unfair dismissal claim. Ensure all required forms are completed accurately, including providing a date of termination. Pay the applicable fee or apply for a waiver promptly. Respond to communications from the Fair Work Commission regarding your application.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2602.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases