the Applicant v MRZ Cars Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 2588
At a glance
- Penalty
- $4,000
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant was employed by MRZ Cars Pty Ltd as a sales person/sales manager starting on September 23, 2024. He was dismissed on March 14, 2026. MRZ is described as a small business. the Applicant often worked varied hours which were accepted by the employer via text messages. The dismissal related to his performance and conduct.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was unfair because it wasn't consistent with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code. While MRZ had a valid reason for the dismissal, the Applicant received no warnings or opportunity to respond to allegations before termination. He also wasn't given notice or allowed a support person. The Commission ordered compensation of $4,000 plus superannuation.
What it means for employers
Small businesses must adhere to fair dismissal procedures even with limited HR expertise. Providing clear warnings and opportunities for employees to improve performance is crucial before termination. Failing to do so can result in costly compensation orders.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to be treated fairly during a dismissal process, including receiving warnings and an opportunity to respond to concerns about their performance. If these rights are not observed, they may be entitled to compensation.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2588.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →