Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

the Applicant v St Vincent's Private Hospitals Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 258

What happened

the Applicant brought an application to the Fair Work Commission concerning contraventions involving his dismissal. The Fair Work Commission case references a previous decision, *the Applicant v Epworth Hospital Richmond* [2025] FWC 3327, and an appeal decision *Viavattene, Peter* [2013] FWCFB 2532. The application was lodged as C2025/9964.

What was decided

the Commissioner dismissed the Applicant’s application under section 587 of the Fair Work Act. The specific reasons for the dismissal are not detailed in the provided text. The document indicates the application concerned contraventions involving dismissal.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure compliance with Fair Work legislation and processes related to dismissals. Reviewing past decisions and understanding the context of similar cases is important.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights and options when facing dismissal, including the ability to bring applications to the Fair Work Commission. Referencing previous decisions can be relevant to understanding the legal landscape.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredundancyunderpaymentsham-contractingmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc258.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases