Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (007V)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2574

What happened

The Applicant applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application related to employees of Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited. Initially, the Respondent raised concerns about inconsistencies in the ballot period and entity name, which the Applicant subsequently amended. The union stated they had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the Respondent.

What was decided

The Commissioner granted leave to amend the application and determined the matter based on submitted documents. The Commission found that a notification time existed for the proposed agreement, and all requirements of section 443(1) were met. A ballot will be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), with voting closing on August 19, 2026, which is 30 working days from the order date. A separate member will conduct a compulsory conciliation conference.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure accuracy when dealing with union bargaining processes and ballot applications. Promptly address any inconsistencies or errors to avoid delays. Be prepared for mandatory conciliation conferences and engage in meaningful negotiations.

What it means for employees

Employees may have the opportunity to vote on a proposed enterprise agreement through a protected action ballot. Understand the process and deadlines involved, as set by the Fair Work Commission and the AEC.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2574.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases