the Applicant v Macedon Ranges Shire Council
Citation: [2026] FWC 2568
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant, a Planning and Building Liaison Officer at Macedon Ranges Shire Council, requested flexible work arrangements allowing him to work four days at home and one day in the office for three weeks a month, and three days at home and one day in the office every fourth week. He initially made this request on November 26, 2024, and again on December 1, 2025, citing his age (over 55) and work-related fatigue as reasons. The council rejected both requests. the Applicant appealed the second rejection but it was also denied based on reasonable business grounds.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that Macedon Ranges Shire Council had reasonable business grounds to refuse the Applicant’s request for more flexible working arrangements. Deputy President noted the council's need for his experience and in-person presence to facilitate knowledge sharing and team connection within the planning team. While acknowledging the Applicant could perform duties remotely, the Commission ordered that the refusal be considered reasonable business grounds under the Fair Work Act. The Council offered a compromise allowing the Applicant to choose office days weekly, subject to operational needs.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully consider flexible work requests and document their reasoning for any rejections. Demonstrating a clear connection between onsite presence and team collaboration or customer service is crucial when citing reasonable business grounds. Regularly reviewing flexible work policies and offering compromises can help manage employee expectations and maintain workplace flexibility.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking flexible work arrangements should clearly articulate how their proposed arrangement won't negatively impact the employer’s operations. Understanding your employer's needs and being open to compromise is important when negotiating flexible working conditions. If a request is denied, ensure the reasons are documented and considered reasonable.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2568.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →